Proiectul Internațional “Omul drag de la
catedră”
Ediția a III-a 2018-2019
Concurs elevi. Simpozion Internațional
dascăli
Inclus în CAERI, anexa 9 din OMEN nr.
3016/09.01.2019, poziția 1518
ISBN 978-606-725-262-0
The Relationship Between Teaching
and Testing
Prof. Vîlceanu
Daniela-Ileana, Colegiul Național ”Tudor Vladimirescu”, Tîrgu-Jiu
For many years, language teaching research and language
testing research have been considered as distinct areas of study. The dialogue
between practitioners in the two fields has been sometimes inexistent and few
times sporadic. But this situation is definitely unproductive. Thus, many test
designers are often unaware of developments in the teaching methods and research,
consequently producing highly reliable items, but without reference to the
realities in the teaching area, so of questionable validity when used for
teaching purposes. Similarly, progress in language testing remains sometimes
unknown to many teaching specialists, who may produce studies that are
innovative in theory, but inadequate in terms of teaching practice.
Research in this domain has shown that specialists in either
teaching or testing are many times ignorant of the other field, not being aware
of the approaches and methods commonly used. This fact has led to increasing
concern among language researchers, and the need for a more extensive dialogue
between specialists in teaching and in testing has become obvious. So, since
the late 1980s, there have been a number of studies in which these two domains
of teaching and testing come together, as there have been discovered many areas
of overlapping and ‘interfacing’ (Bachman, Cohen, 1998:1).
First of all, both second language teaching and testing focus
on ‘what’ and ‘how’ issues (Shohamy, in Bachman, Cohen, 1998:156): language
teaching is ‘concerned with what the learner’s language is at a given point and
how further language can best be acquired, and language testing is concerned
with what language ability (knowledge) is and how it can best be measured’.
(Shohamy, in Bachman, Cohen, 1998:156). As the two fields are interrelated, it
is obvious that each can benefit from advances made in the other.
Thus, language teaching specialists can advise language
testers of the effects on testing of differences between second and first
language, for example. Then language testers can adjust the test they design
according to the information they get, especially concerning differences among
groups and individuals. So there should be a closer cooperation between
specialists in the two domains. The construction of quality language tests is
related to the integration of knowledge from the field of language teaching and
learning.
Researchers in language teaching can produce hypotheses and
questions that should then be dealt with by language testers, and ‘the results
should lead to new or revised hypotheses and continuation of the process’.
(Shohamy, in Bachman, Cohen, 1998:171)
Team work will definitely make it possible to design
assessment instruments and procedures that can offer a ‘broader picture of the
language of the learner’ (Shohamy, in Bachman, Cohen, 1998:172). Similarly,
teaching specialists can obtain from language testers clear evidence confirming
the fact that the instruments used are reliable and valid.
They could rely on language testers to evaluate the quality
of their instruments or tasks. Then they could use the findings to interpret
language test results and to advise testers of possible problems that appear.
This type of cooperation will surely lead to the formulation of more valid
theories in the field of research and to ‘more sound decisions about individual
learners’ (Shohamy, in Bachman, Cohen, 1998:172).
Bibliography
Bachman,
L. F., Cohen, A. D. (eds) 1998: Interfaces
Between Second Language Acquisition and Language Testing Research, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press;
Chaudron,
C. 1988: Second Language Classroom:
Research on Teaching and Learning, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Niciun comentariu:
Trimiteți un comentariu